Zinc is a piece of software used by all Scala developers all around the globe. Contributing to it has a far-reaching impact in all these Scala developers, and the Zinc team tries to make it a fun and motivating experience.
To contribute to Zinc, start a conversation before creating a pull request. This can be in a new Issue, continuing the conversation in an existing issue, Discussion, or any other communication channel being used by the project. This gives maintainers and other contributors a chance to work with you on your idea at an earlier stage to make sure it is an acceptable contribution.
Effective bug reports are more likely to be fixed. These guidelines explain how to write such reports.
Please open a GitHub issue when you are 90% sure it's an actual bug.
The developers need three things from you: steps, problems, and expectations.
The most important thing to remember about bug reporting is to clearly distinguish facts and opinions.
What we need first is the exact steps to reproduce your problems on our computers. This is called reproduction steps, which is often shortened to "repro steps" or "steps." Describe your method of running sbt. Provide build.sbt that caused the problem and the version of sbt or Scala that was used. Provide sample Scala code if it's to do with incremental compilation. If possible, minimize the problem to reduce non-essential factors.
Repro steps are the most important part of a bug report. If we cannot reproduce the problem in one way or the other, the problem can't be fixed. Telling us the error messages is not enough.
Next, describe the problems, or what you think is the problem. It might be "obvious" to you that it's a problem, but it could actually be an intentional behavior for some backward compatibility etc. For compilation errors, include the stack trace. The more raw info the better.
Same as the problems. Describe what you think should've happened.
Add any optional notes section to describe your analysis.
The subject of the bug report doesn't matter. A more descriptive subject is certainly better, but a good subject really depends on the analysis of the problem, so don't worry too much about it. "Undercompilation after changing Java enum" is good enough.
If possible, please format code or console outputs.
On GitHub it's:
```scala
name := "foo"
```
On StackOverflow, it's:
<!-- language: lang-scala -->
name := "foo"
Here's a simple sample case: #830. Finally, thank you for taking the time to report a problem.
If this is your first time contributing to Zinc, take some time to get familiar with Zinc. To get you started as soon as possible, we have written a series of guides that explain the underlying concepts of Zinc and how incremental compilation works in 1.0.
Guides:
- Understanding Incremental Recompilation.
- Scala Lang blog post on Zinc release.
- All the issues and PRs labelled as
docswill help you understand different aspects of Zinc. They both count with concrete information that are helpful to understand tradeoffs and implementation details.
If you find this information outdated, open a pull request, issue, or discussion.
This section describes how you can create Pull Requests (PRs) and describes coding standards we use when implementing them.
Given the wide user base and the long history, not all issues are valid or relevant.
- Before working on a pull request, please confirm with a Maintainer that a contribution is wanted for the issue.
- Before working on a pull request, please confirm that you can reproduce the reported problem using GitHub Actions or your computer.
- After making the code change, please confirm that your change compiles, and has fixed the problem.
We do not always have the bandwidth to play the QA role. To must minimize the review burden, Maintainers might close a PR if it fails to pass the CI in a few rounds.
If you can express the reproduction as a test that would be great, but often the problems require locally building Zinc and running test builds yourself. For local testing, post screenshots or screencast to demonstrate that the fix works at least on your machine.
sbt --client compileSee LLM_POLICY.md.
- Create a fork of the repository.
- Go to the Actions tab, and enable the workflows. This will let you run the CI tests on your forked repository.
- Clone the forked repository to create a local copy.
Zinc uses two branches for development: Use the default branch set on GitHub for bug fixes. For backports, use the latest stable branch.
- Development branch:
develop - Stable branch:
1.$MINOR.x, where$MINORis current minor version (e.g.2.0.xduring 2.0.x series)
The develop branch represents the next minor update to sbt 2.x series.
Before you submit a Pull Request (PR) from your forked repo, check that it meets these guidelines:
- Confirm that you can reproduce the problem prior to making the changes to the code.
- Include tests, either as scripted test or unit tests to your pull request, or screenshots from a manual test.
- Follow our project's Commit message guideline.
- Follow our project's [Coding style and best practices][03].
- Sign the Scala Contributor License Agreement.
- Make sure your PR is small and focused on one change only - avoid adding unrelated changes, mixing adding features and refactoring. Keeping to that rule will make it easier to review your PR and will make it easier for core devs if they decide that your change should be cherry-picked to release it in a stable release of sbt.
- Maintainers will not merge a PR that regresses linting or does not pass CI tests (unless you have good justification that it a transient error or something that is being fixed in other PR).
- Maintainers will not merge a PR that breaks binary compatibility ("bincompat"). Run
mimaReportBinaryIssuesfrom the sbt shell. - When merging PRs, Maintainer may use Squash and Merge which means then your PR will be merged as one commit, regardless of the number of commits in your PR. During the review cycle, you can keep a commit history for easier review.
- You can use any supported JDK version to run the tests, but the best is to check if it works for the oldest supported version (JDK 17 currently). In rare cases tests might fail with the oldest version when you use features that are available in newer JDK versions.
- Add an Apache header to all new files. Run
headerCreateand sbt will put a copyright notice into it.
See Coding sylt and best practices.
Zinc features a testing infrastructure encompassing multiple testing methodologies designed to ensure reliability and functionality across different integrations.
Incremental-compilation behavior is covered end to end by the scripted tests in zinc/src/sbt-test.
Zinc also has a JMH benchmark suite. This benchmark suite can benchmark any project that runs on 2.12.x/2.11.x. The Zinc team uses it to make sure that there's not a performance regression in the Zinc compiler phases.
Follow the following template:
[2.x] fix: Fix consoleProject not starting
**Problem**
consoleProject doesn't work. REPL doesn't even start.
**Solution**
I made some progress into consoleProject.
At least Scala 3.7 repl session will now start.
Generated-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5
- (Optional) Subject should start with
[2.x]for develop branch, and[1.x]for Zinc 1.x - Subject should start with
fix(bug fix),feat(new feature),refactor,test,ci, ordeps - Subject should use imperative mood, for example Fix foo, Add bar.
- Body should include Problem section, which summarizes the current understanding of the issue.
- Body should include Solution section, which summarizes your approach to fixing the issue.
- Do not at-mention people in the commit message.
- Include "Generated-by" tag for Gen-AI tools.
Contributing to Zinc requires you or your employer to sign the Scala Contributor License Agreement.