Repository navigation
bound withDensity and withMetadata density to a valid range - #4631
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thank you for adding this |
lovell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Unbounded output density
The
densitygiven towithMetadata()andwithDensity()was only checked as a positive number, so a value such as1e8is accepted but then falls outside the libvipsxres/yresproperty range, which logs aGLib-GObject-CRITICALand silently clamps the stored resolution. Bounded both setters to 1-100000 so an out-of-range value is rejected up front, matching the existingdensityinput option.