Repository navigation
Conversation
|
@SeqLaz could you fix the conflict ? 🦾 |
|
@nirvn whenever you can review this, please go ahead :) |
9ab94dc to
43f7b58
Compare
|
@gounux All is on green lights! 🦾 Just a review from your side will be good! |
|
Let's wait for @nirvn review here, no need to hurry on this one. One review is enough ;) |
|
@SeqLaz , looking at this now. One generic comment: please do not merge different objectives / changes into a single commit. You smashed the removal of cloudify and the addition of the project checker into one commit. When people will git log (or git blame) in the future, it'll be misleading. |
|
@SeqLaz , would it be possible to remove the project checker change out of this PR into a separate one? |
Many thanks @nirvn 🥷!!! |
|
Not sure why we need to close the PR, since you can force push the correct commits only here. In any case, better delete the branch afterwards. |
|
@nirvn @suricactus @gounux in this PR #840 is only the part of removing the cloudify option! After is merged, I will create a new PR with the integration of the project checker step before enter the project details |
Simplifies the cloud project creation dialog in QFieldSync by removing the option "Convert currently open project to cloud project (recommended)" conversion option, defaulting to direct QFieldCloud project creation, and introducing a dedicated project compatibility step using
ProjectChecker.Note that the file
qfieldsync/core/cloud_converter.pywas removed (requested by linter)untitled.webm